Press Enter to search or Esc to close

For me, cinema is just Tarkovsky.

Life
For me, cinema is just Tarkovsky.
Posted Fri Sep 04 2026
Updated Thu Sep 17 2026

When I discovered Tarkovsky, I was 17. I ran to my mother and told her: look, look what I found... it's slow, you have to observe, and I was so euphoric I didn't even notice it wasn't the right moment because she was eating, and Tarkovsky requires utmost attention. So I tried to convince her, to snatch a few seconds to make her watch those long tracking shots over the grass, and in the dirty water... nothing, I didn't see the necessary attention in her eyes, I continued to feel alone, but in the company of a good auteur. I had naivety to spare. I felt like I had discovered someone in the world who understood me.

The film I was trying to show her was Stalker, which I had already watched twice. I had downloaded it by mistake instead of a video game of the same name: by mistake... imagine how much change a mistake can bring... because from that day on, I underwent a drastic plot twist; I even forgot about the video game, forever. I had never seen anything like it before; I didn't even think... certain cinema existed. Yet it existed, and it came from Russia. I was so taken that I started studying Russian so I could rewatch the films in Russian... needless to say, I abandoned the mission; I didn't have enough guts, time, or desire to delve into a language as complex as that, and to this day I had to settle for translations, dubbing, and subtitles.

But I was so enthusiastic that someone, over a beer, suggested I go study cinema at university, and right then I liked the idea, so I decided to enroll the following year... pity though that, upon completing my studies, I didn't learn to appreciate anything else outside of Tarkovsky (who, by the way, they didn't even introduce to me), and I was even forced to end my relationship with cinema in general, which I haven't followed or watched since.

My history with cinema was solely my history with Tarkovsky, nothing more and nothing less. Apart from a small love affair with noir, which also signed off my graduation thesis... there was no other relationship besides that. I loved nothing. Everything felt like bait to me... a hook hanging in the sea of existence. Cinema felt like a clever trap, an entertaining monstrosity... a diversion to escape the here and now, a consolation, a plaything to waste time.

Films shape our imagination: the good and the bad. Sometimes you think you're on the right path, but in reality, it only sounds right because you saw it in a movie, even if you don't remember it. Sometimes a path frightens you just because it recalls a terrifying scene. When we get the impression of having lived a moment that reminded us of a scene from a movie we liked... suddenly a notification rings in our head... like video game sound effects when you earn a bonus... and life seems to have found the right fit, the correct combination. It would be a bit like the Tao. There, yes, Cinema as the Tao of modern times. It is the Way: non-action is when our life finds references in cinema.

With Tarkovsky, on the other hand, I had to admit I felt more alive; I watched him to meditate and contemplate, I watched him to reconnect with the earth, with living itself, with the very sense of being here... because I liked the way he filmed things, slowly... giving you time to absorb them fully, to transcend them. With Tarkovsky, I realized I wasn't the only one looking at things in a certain way, slowly, savoring them down to the atom and beyond. Without ever losing sight of the awareness of being present.

Right after, I also bought Solaris... and watched it twice... 6 hours straight. In that moment, I understood myself a little better, and I realized that my way of looking at things wasn't wrong, but simply another one that needed to be embraced.

With love, to Tarkovkskij

Tarkovsky - Stalker